Google Earth 5 Review | Technology Blog

Google Earth 5 Review

This item was filled under Google

Google Earth upped the cartographic ante again today with Google Earth 5 for Windows and Mac. As CNET News reported back in April 2008, the latest version incorporates even more data from NASA, the BBC, National Geographic, and other proprietary sources to create one of the most unique map offerings ever, meshing comprehensive real-time data on Earth’s surface with information on the oceans, the stars that we see, historical maps, and topographical information on Mars.

Google_Earth_5_chlorophyll_map_610x541 Google Earth 5 Review

Google Earth’s new Ocean feature includes a downloadable layer to view global chlorophyll levels.


Conceptually, the oceanic maps are great. It is beyond cool to be able to see ocean-related points of interest like shipwrecks, and have cross-referenced content like undersea explorations. The interface remains flexible in the new version, too. Hot keys CTRL+ALT+B and CTRL+ALT+T toggle the sidebar and toolbar, respectively, making it simple to maximize screen real estate. Meanwhile, Google’s use of scientific content from multiple oceanographic concerns makes this one of the few places that the public can access such an incredible range of facts, figures, and true stories of the sea from one place.

However, it shouldn’t surprise many that the execution of the new features leaves much to be desired.

Searching in Google Earth is still atrocious. Even when you have Oceans activated, typing in “Titanic” into the search field will get you nowhere. If you adjust the term to “Titanic shipwreck,” your results seem to depend on your most recently searched locations. After looking at San Francisco, searching for “Titanic shipwreck” showed me a list of shops and restaurants that had “Titanic” in the name. After closing and re-starting Google Earth, and searching for “Titanic shipwreck” again, the globe panned over to the correct part of the North Atlantic but did not zoom in.

For Google to fail so hard with its search algorithms is like Ford failing to stay on top of developing car tech.

(Credit: CNET Networks)

Read More

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Rate this topic:
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
Views: 768 views
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Comment